occupyallstreets:

Anti-War Protesters Again Denied Permit For NATO Summit March
A judge on Thursday rejected a request from anti-war protesters to demonstrate during the NATO summit of world leaders in May, but organizers said they would protest anyway and hope to draw 10,000 people or more opposed to war in Afghanistan.

“I can say definitively we are marching on May 20. We will hold a peaceful protest,” leader Andy Thayer said. He said organizers would get together to decide whether to appeal to a higher court.

Anti-war protesters want to march on May 20 and frustrated by the city’s refusal to allow a march that day. Activists have warned there could be a confrontation such as that during the anti-Vietnam War protests at the Democratic convention in 1968, which has marred Chicago’s image ever since.
The judge’s ruling on Thursday agreed with the city of Chicago, which had earlier denied the permit after a hearing at which city officials said the march would clog traffic and over-tax police resources.
The city had granted protesters a permit to hold a virtually identical rally and march on the day before, May 19, which coincided with a scheduled G8 summit prior to the NATO meeting. But the G8 summit was shifted to Camp David, near Washington, and Chicago protesters asked to move their demonstration a day later.
“Common sense tells you the city said it had enough resources to approve our application for May 19, when it had two summits. Now they say they don’t have enough personnel. It totally defies logic,” Thayer said.
A city spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment.
Source

occupyallstreets:

Anti-War Protesters Again Denied Permit For NATO Summit March

A judge on Thursday rejected a request from anti-war protesters to demonstrate during the NATO summit of world leaders in May, but organizers said they would protest anyway and hope to draw 10,000 people or more opposed to war in Afghanistan.

I can say definitively we are marching on May 20. We will hold a peaceful protest,” leader Andy Thayer said. He said organizers would get together to decide whether to appeal to a higher court.

Anti-war protesters want to march on May 20 and frustrated by the city’s refusal to allow a march that day. Activists have warned there could be a confrontation such as that during the anti-Vietnam War protests at the Democratic convention in 1968, which has marred Chicago’s image ever since.

The judge’s ruling on Thursday agreed with the city of Chicago, which had earlier denied the permit after a hearing at which city officials said the march would clog traffic and over-tax police resources.

The city had granted protesters a permit to hold a virtually identical rally and march on the day before, May 19, which coincided with a scheduled G8 summit prior to the NATO meeting. But the G8 summit was shifted to Camp David, near Washington, and Chicago protesters asked to move their demonstration a day later.

Common sense tells you the city said it had enough resources to approve our application for May 19, when it had two summits. Now they say they don’t have enough personnel. It totally defies logic,” Thayer said.

A city spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment.

Source

(via jayaprada)

  1. wewererolemodels reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  2. littleselfishme reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  3. occupyla reblogged this from antidelusions
  4. sans-nuage reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  5. americanwanderlust reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  6. ideoclast reblogged this from amodernmanifesto
  7. amodernmanifesto reblogged this from jayaprada
  8. nemo-sunt reblogged this from sinidentidades
  9. gracefree reblogged this from sinidentidades
  10. jayaprada reblogged this from sinidentidades
  11. silas216 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  12. lilfeelz reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  13. citizen-earth reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  14. alleexx08 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  15. barefootbandet reblogged this from theaquabrat and added:
    Its stupid. The constitution says you have a right to peacefully protest. You do not need permission from your...
  16. shrineart reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  17. meowchristinekitty reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  18. noahmanskar reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  19. pandahspunk reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  20. okeday reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  21. mindovermatterloveoverhate reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  22. har-megiddo reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  23. napalmjoy reblogged this from anarcho-queer and added:
    DO IT ANYWAY
  24. romanshowers reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  25. bulletinaweave reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  26. theaquabrat reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  27. z6m7 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
Short URL for this post: http://tmblr.co/ZZ-J-xIp91ID